Ai

On April 23, Anthropic published a postmortem acknowledging three product-layer bugs that degraded Claude Code from March 4 through April 20. They frame it as: model weights unchanged, harness bugs fixed, problem solved. The three bugs are real. Their impact was real. The fixes were real. But the postmortem is a carefully scoped document that tells half the truth. Here’s the other half. What They Admitted (Correctly) Bug Introduced Fixed Duration Effort high → medium March 4 (v2.1.68) April 21 (v2.1.117) 48 days Thinking cache clear every turn March 26 (v2.1.85) April 10 (v2.1.101) 15 days “≤25 words” system prompt April 16 (v2.1.111) April 20 (v2.1.116) 4 days All three are product-layer issues — API parameters and system prompts, not model weights. The combined effect: effort reduced thinking depth, thinking cache destroyed session memory, word limit truncated output. Together, these made Claude appear significantly dumber. ...

On April 23, Anthropic published a postmortem acknowledging three product-layer bugs that degraded Claude Code from March 4 through April 20. No model weights were changed — all three issues were in the harness/product layer. I cross-checked every claim against the public CHANGELOG (3,285 lines, v2.1.68–v2.1.119), 8 GitHub issues via gh issue view, and 10 external sources. 36 claims checked — 28 confirmed, 5 partially confirmed, 3 not relied upon. Here’s what the postmortem says, what the CHANGELOG actually shows, and what still isn’t fixed. ...

I pay $200/month for Claude Code Max 20. On April 1, my quota hit 100% in 70 minutes during normal coding. That turned out to be two cache bugs — Anthropic fixed them in v2.1.90–91, and it made a real difference. But even after the fix, I wanted to understand where the quota actually goes. So I filed issues, dug into community threads, and built a transparent proxy to measure every API call. ...